the winter I begin the practice
of making bread,
water, salt, flour,
yeast,
blistered crusts that
holdsweet softness?
—from “Artisan Bread,” Kate Fadick
Kate Fadick worked for over
25 years as a community organizer and advocate for social justice in rural
Appalachian communities and urban neighborhoods. She lives in Cincinnati and
now considers her day job as that of "poet." Her work has appeared in Appalachian Connection, Pine
Mountain Sand and Gravel, For a Better World (anthology of poems and drawings
around the theme of social justice), A Few Good Words (Cincinnati Writers
Project 2012 anthology), and Buddhist
Poetry Review.
* * *
As
mentioned in my review of Slipstream,
I met Kate Fadick at a monthly meeting of The Greater Cincinnati Writers
League, a poetry critique group that's been in existence for over 80 years. I
began to see more of her at local workshops, poetry readings, and eventually at
The Cincinnati Writers Project's poetry critique group. Her poems intrigue me,
with their brevity and yet their wealth of suggestion, haiku-like poems that expand
with meaning—poems
you want to read many times. When Finishing Line Press accepted her
chapbook, I was excited that these richly nuanced poems would be available for
others to enjoy.
____________________________________________________________
KF: I began writing
poems as a third grader. I still remember my teacher’s name—Miss
Belle McGaughey—and the actual mimeograph book she
created of several poems I wrote while in her class. A few years later I
entered what was to become a long silence, writing occasionally, but rarely showing
what I wrote to anyone. It was in my 50’s that I began to call myself a poet
and call writing my “work." Writing, for me, has to do with the way I want
to live my life; it’s a way of paying attention, of “showing up."
One of the
things I admire most about your poems is how rhythmic they are, through the use
of assonance, alliteration, and internal rhyme. I know you were once a member
of Muse, Cincinnati's women's choir. Do you feel there is a connection
between that and how your poems are so rich in sound and rhythm?
KF: That’s an intriguing question. I
haven’t thought of the crafting of poems in that way, but now that you mention
it, I realize that the physical act of writing a poem is very much like musical
notation for me. I hear my poems before I write anything down….often find
myself speaking them aloud as I drive somewhere or cook or lay in bed
sleepless. And then, as I write them first with pen and paper followed by using
my laptop, I continue to “speak them," adding and cutting words as I go.
You have a skill
for breaking lines at interesting points, really working line breaks to add
layers of meaning to your poems. I’m curious if that’s something that comes
naturally to you, and/or if you studied particular poets who excel in that
area?
KF: The line breaks are a part of the
musicality of the poem. Like the rests in a piece of music, the line breaks
open up a space in the poem. They help expose the layered images, inviting the
reader into the heart of the poem. They do come somewhat naturally for me—being a singer
has something to do with it, I suspect. I do pay attention to what other poets
do with line breaks—Kay
Ryan, W. S. Merwin, Li-Young Lee, Lucille Clifton—to name a few.
I’m
fascinated by several of the poems in your chapbook that have no punctuation,
such as “yesterday in a forgotten box,” and “This is Enough;” and how you use
line breaks to reveal meaning and/or unfold the story. Is this a decision from
the beginning of a poem’s genesis, or is it something that surfaces during
later revisions? And can you describe what about a poem makes you want to shape
it that way?
KF: Early drafts are usually
punctuated. It’s when I begin to cut words and lines that I take it out. When
the poem is really right, I find that punctuation would get in the way of its
natural flow and wind up removing it all. I find myself using punctuation less
and less as my work continues the transition from narrative to more lyric tone
begun with some of the pieces in Slipstream.
Your poems often contain
an element of ambiguity that results in a sense of mystery that keeps me
thinking about them long after I’ve finished reading them. I believe that’s a
choice you made. Can you explain why and what you hoped to accomplish through
allowing for multiple interpretations, or various levels of meaning, in your
poems?
KF: I think the ambiguity is there
because, as Merwin is fond of saying, and I paraphrase—poetry is in
some sense about what can’t be said—about those places in our experience
when words fail us. I write poems about what I don’t know and in the writing am
led to some understanding of some part of my life that hasn’t been attended to.
And I hope the ambiguity, the mystery, pulls the reader into some part of her
or his experience that is as yet unspoken.
Are you writing
for a particular audience? What do you hope your readers come away with
from your poems?
KF: I really don’t have a particular
audience in mind. It can be discouraging to realize how few of the people in my
life read anyone’s poetry, let alone mine. I think it safe to say that in this
country, relatively few read a substantial amount of poetry. So, I’m thrilled
to hear people talk about the poetry they do read; and if it’s mine they happen
to talk about, I hope they are coming away from the poems with more questions
than answers.
KF: That work was about making a
different world more likely, a more just world, a less violent world, a more
sustainable world. I think poetry can help us continue to hope in such
possibility when only the opposite seems likely.
So many of the
poems in your book abound with birds, insects, animals, flowers, trees,
gardens, bodies of water. Why is the natural world important to you, and
what do you see as its role in your poetry?
KF: Gary Synder says that humans are nature. My poems seem to reflect that—at least I hope they do. We can’t
live well without that intimate, mutual relationship with all that is other
than ourselves. Close to home for you
and me is the mountain top removal that bears a grotesque witness to the lack
of mutuality with nature.
One of the poems
I didn’t mention in the review of Slipstream is “Welcome the Stranger,” which
reveals the integral connection between the woodpecker and the saguaro cactus
it makes its nest inside. What was the inspiration for this poem? Did you
see such a nest in person, did you read about it, or learn about it in a
documentary?
KF: “Welcome the Stranger” came out of a
visit with friends in the Southwest. They have an adobe in the desert, and it
was there I found a saguaro boot, as they are called. I had never seen one
before, and after my friends told what they knew, I “googled” and learned
more. The poem is about the connections between
the woodpecker and the cactus, as well as the human connection to what goes on
in nature. I hope the poem also speaks to our response to other beings.
Do you
have a favorite poem/poems from Slipstream and why?
KF: The poem we’ve just discussed is
certainly one of my favorites because it is for me a very personal poem written
in such a way that no reader has to know the backstory. I’m tending toward that
more and more with my work. “Eve Before Surgery” is another like that.
Tell us about
the writer groups you belong to and how they’ve contributed to your poetry. Do
you have any suggestions for poets concerning critique groups?
KF: I’ve been a member of Greater
Cincinnati Writers League for several years and the poetry group of the
Cincinnati Writers Project for two or three. They are very important to my
writing in a couple of ways. They are each in their unique way a connection to
other poets in the area and their work. And, they are places where early drafts
get a hearing and a critique that always leads to a stronger poem. Mary Oliver
talks about the solitary act of writing, that eventually one has to sit down
and do it. I agree with that. However, it is good to have companions along the
way to that solitary place. While critique is necessary for my writing, in the
end I make the decisions about the poem. I like making informed ones.
Who are the
poets that most influenced you and/or whose poems intrigued you most?
KF: It’s hard for me to think in
terms of whose work intrigues me most, or even who favorite poets or poems are
for me. It’s usually the ones I’m
reading at any given time. Right now
you’d find in various reading spots around my house Mary Oliver (always
someplace), Merwin, Langston Hughes, Nancy Willard, Jane Hirshfield (always
someplace), Mark Doty, Jim Harrison, Anne Carson, and others.
What are you
working on now?
KF: I’m working on another chapbook
of pieces many of which began with walks in Cincinnati’s Spring Grove Cemetery…working
title is “surrounded by weary angels."
I’m also working on a short cycle of 6-8 pieces which I think will have
a spot in the collection. They are
series of self portraits as a woman
with whom I sense some connection. For example, “Self Portrait as Hildegard of
Bingen."
A
sampling of Kate Fadick's poems on-line:
- "Road Trip," Buddhist Poetry Review
- Listen to a WVXU "Around Cincinnati" radio interview to hear Fadick read "Slipstream," "Artisan Bread," "This
Is Enough."
________________________________________________________________
Karen
George lives in Northern Kentucky. Since she retired from computer
programming to write full-time, she has enjoyed traveling to historic river
towns, mountain country, and her first European trip. Her chapbook, Into
the Heartland, was released by Finishing Line Press
in 2011. You can find her recent and forthcoming work in Memoir,
The Louisville Review, Border Crossing, Permafrost, Blast Furnace, Kudzu, and The Heartland Review.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank-you for sharing your thoughts with us!