I
eat them from a bowl, lick
their
succulence from my thumb and finger,tongue the whorls and pads, suck
my own sweet flesh, linger
in
the feedback loop of warm and wet.
Sherry Chandler’s work has appeared in many magazines and anthologies, including The Louisville Review, The Cortland Review, The William and Mary Review, Kestrel, and Calyx. Her work has twice been nominated for the Pushcart Prize. Chandler has had professional development support from the Kentucky Arts Council and the Kentucky Foundation for Women.
Chandler was born and raised in rural Owen County, Kentucky.
A 1963 graduate of Owen
County High
School Georgetown College University of Kentucky
(MA). She has recently retired from a 25-year career as a board-certified
Editor in the Life Sciences. Chandler lives in Bourbon County, Kentucky with
her husband, the wood carver T. R. Williams. She has twin sons and twin
grandchildren.
* * *
As I mention in my
review of The Woodcarver's Wife (click here for the review), I first met Sherry Chandler several years ago at a reading and panel discussion
held as part of the Kentucky Women Writers Conference in Lexington, Kentucky. The past two years I've enjoyed participating with her and other
poets in writing a new poem every day during the month of June for the Lexington Poetry Month Writing Challenge, organized by Hap Houlihan of the Morris Book Shop and Katerina Stoykova-Klemer of Accents
Publishing to promote local poets and poetry.
—Karen
L. George
(This interview was conducted via email.)
* * *
On your author website it says you didn't publish a poem until 1993 and
that your first chapbook was published in 2003.
Had you been writing poetry for years, and just hadn't submitted it for
publication, or did you begin writing poetry later in life?
SC: I was nine or ten years old before a television
set was considered as essential to the home as a cookstove, especially in our
rural community. Although we did have radio, and I remember listening to series
like The Lone Ranger and The Shadow on radio, everybody read:
Agatha Christie, The Courier Journal,
Motor Trend, Superman comics. As the youngest in the family, I was the only
one in the house who couldn’t read, and I did a lot of begging to be read to.
Eventually l became an
omnivorous but naïve reader. When I decided to concentrate on poetry, my first
task was to learn what it is—a task I’ll probably never finish. A task I hope I
never finish.
Although I started out behind, I
always wrote, even if it was just letters. Before I wrote in any other genre, I
was known as an entertaining correspondent. Alas! The form was archaic before I
set pen to paper.
Setting pen to paper, by the
way, the act of writing is something I enjoy.
I wrote a few poems in college
but studying the English canon convinced me that the poet was next to God, a
height to which I could never aspire, not the least because of my gender.
Fiction writers at least had to
be grounded, so I spent several years learning the short story. I even had a
little success. Got an artist enrichment grant from the Kentucky Arts Council
and used the money to attend the Indiana University’s summer writer’s
conference.
I’ve had two big epiphanies in
my development as a poet: One was reading “The Red Wheelbarrow;” the other was
hearing Andrew Hudgins read at IU. He was not comparing anyone to a summer’s
day or daring to eat a peach; he might be explaining the ways of God to man,
but he was doing it by writing about church ladies with funeral parlor fans. He
was writing poetry about the world I lived in. I could do that!
So that was 1989 and I was 44 years old. That was when I became a serious poet.
What made you first want to write poetry? And why led you to submit
your poetry for publication?
SC: I don’t know why I wanted to write poetry. As I say
above, I wanted to write and once I got over my awe of it, I realized that
poetry is the genre best suited to my particular imagination. My mother used to
recite poems she had memorized in school: “The Song of Hiawatha,” “Paul
Revere’s Ride,” “October’s Bright Blue Weather,” “The Swing.” Henry Wadsworth
Longfellow, Helen Hunt Jackson, poets we’d long-since dismissed as too popular,
but I didn’t know that. What I did know was the pleasure they brought my mother
and I loved to hear her say them. That’ll do for a reason, to please my mother.
I do know why I offer poems to
journals: Ego. The world has room for only one Emily Dickinson. For most of us,
the writing process is incomplete without publication. Acceptance by the
gatekeepers. Of course the nature of publication has changed since I started writing
and people are finding ways to by-pass the gatekeepers – or create new ones.
Self-publishing, in print or online, doesn’t carry the stigma it did in the 20th
Century, and poets who post their work to their blogs get more readers than
poets published in traditional print outlets.
One of the things
I admire most about your poems is how rhythmic they are because of your use of
assonance, alliteration, internal and end rhyme. Do you have a musical
background that instilled this element into your poetry? And is this something
that finds its way into your early drafts or do you add it in later revisions?
SC: Thank you.
The
always-in-the-present me forgets how old I am. As I said, I lived several years
before television made it into everybody’s living room. In those days people
had to entertain themselves and most everybody played some sort of instrument.
And in my particular case, people would gather at the general store on Saturday
nights. They sat in the back room among the sweet-smelling bags of feed and
jammed while the children chased lightning bugs or took each other on snipe
hunts.
Or
they’d roll back the rugs in somebody’s house and have a square dance.
It’s
just too Norman Rockwell for words, isn’t it?
Well, I suspect there may have been a bottle involved.
Robert
Pinsky says because the accentual cadences of spoken English require not just
changes in volume but also in pitch, it’s almost as though we are singing to
one another all the time. I like to push my poetry toward singing. I am, in fact,
a bit word drunk. With practice, the devices that started out as add-ons in
revision are internalized and start to appear in first drafts.
What is it that compels you to write formal poetry? Is it a decision
you make while, or after, you write a first draft of a poem?
SC: I find working with restraints
pushes me to surprise myself. It can be really hard to write in (something I
laughingly call) meter and rhyme. The biggest temptation is to pad lines.
Earlier poets do it shamelessly – all those “I did go” constructions and
inversions to hit the meter – and it was partly that wordiness that made the
modern poets embrace free verse. If you work in rhymed and metered verse now,
it has to read like ordinary speech. “I didn’t realize it was a sonnet” is about
the highest praise I receive.
The
second temptation is to sound “poetic.” I don’t want iambics to over-ride my
natural-born cadences.
It culminates as a sort of
synthesis if I’m lucky.
Any
number of poets (Robert Graves, Richard Wilbur) say a poem finds its own form.
Molly Peacock suggests that form is a scaffolding not a cage. I work the
reverse of your question – I sometimes use form to generate the work and edit
it out in the revisions. And sometimes the poem just won’t do what you tell it
to do. “For my Valentine” defied me. I tried to make it a sonnet, because it’s
a love poem, but Wooly Bully insisted on a bigger role so I had to open the
gate and let him run. The result is much more relaxed and, I hope, amusing.
Your bio says, "You recently retired from a 25-year career as a
board-certified Editor in the Life Sciences." Can you tell us more about this work, and did
it play into your poetry writing?
SC: I worked for academic physicians, doctors who doctor,
teach, and research. That’s a big commitment and I admire them tremendously.
Besides they have the money to pay editors.
Part of what I did was to
translate jargon into plain English. Writing for medical journals follows a
very strict form, much tighter than formal poetry, and papers are heavily peer
reviewed. Medical researchers have to be very careful not to claim cause and
effect. As a result, doctors don’t trust the sentence. They think it’s gonna
haul off and assert something. So they subordinate (badly) and qualify and hang
so many constraints on any statement, use so many acronyms, and so much jargon
that the poor sentence is choked almost to non-meaning. In addition to which, a
fair number of my clients spoke English as a second language. So I had to
become an expert on the sentence, first to pull it apart and figure out what it
intended to convey and second to put it back together so that it said what it
meant.
It was a bit like working for
Humpty-Dumpty:
“When
I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, “it means just
what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less.
I also had the job of writing
consent forms that made the research understandable on the sixth grade level.
That was my favorite part of the job. I prided myself on writing elegant
consents.
The most “readable” text is not
that comprised of one simple declarative sentence after another. Intelligent
subordination works best in consents and in poetry. To be nimble with English
syntax is essential. Even if you’re going to violate syntax, you first need to
know how it works.
Several of your poems contain lists, such as in "Bennet's New
Latin Grammar (1895): A Love Poem"
it's grammatical terms, and in "Clearing Out" it's items someone has
collected throughout a lifetime, and in "The Woodcarver's Wife" it's
carving tools and types of wood. Can you tell us how you decide which items to
include, and do you arrange them in a particular way for some effect?
SC: There is music — and magic — in the names of things.
Ancient cultures thought to know the true name was to have power over. Gertrude
Stein says "A noun is a name of anything, why after a thing is named write
about it.” But I write about it too.
I wanted “The Woodcarver’s Wife”
to function like a rhapsody, constantly changing form, rhythm, and mood. I
wanted those lists to just tumble down the page and off the tongue, and I was
lucky enough to find some rhymes to help with the music. If I was successful,
the lists don’t just accumulate, they culminate. They chant like a shaman:
Chain
saws,
pole
saws, bow saws,
adzes,
scoops,
scorps
mauls
wedges
In “Bennet’s” I tried to pick
grammatical charts and tables that would undercut the speaker, providing
glimpses of the relationship. Latin is wonderful for that purpose, having forms
like “accusative of the result produced” and “moods of indirect discourse.”
Because it’s a somewhat comic poem, I let it get a little raunchy. Love those
copulatives and supines.
I've discovered you're posting micro poetry on your Twitter and
Facebook page. What inspired you to do this and how long have you been doing
it?
SC: Blogging brought me in contact with one Dave Bonta, an
avid supporter of open-source publishing on the web (http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/08/should-poetry-be-open-source/
) Dave, who lives in the Pennsylvania Appalachians,
writes a micro poem daily, which he posts on Morning Porch (http://morningporch.com/). Before I made a cyber connection with Dave, all I had
seen and read about what was called “TwitterPo” was derogatory, but I admired
what Dave was doing and decided to try it for myself.
I started out with two rules.
First my postings would serve me as a sort of meditation – not just to observe
one thing closely each day but also to find fresh language to evoke what I see.
Second, the postings would be ephemeral. That is to say, I’d put them out there
and let them go.
I opened my Twitter account in
April 2008; that means I’m into my 7th year of writing micro-poetry.
As it stands today I’ve made over 1600 posts and have about 3600 followers.
From time to time, someone will ask me whether I intend to put the tweets in a
book but I want to stay true to my original concept.
I only have one regret – when I
set up my Twitter account I had to choose a name. For reasons too complicated
to explain, I chose the name @BluegrassPoet, as though somehow there was only
one. To all the other wonderful Bluegrass Poets out there, I do apologize.
Some
other good micropoets: @morningporch, @jdbrush, @morganabag, @krislindbeck
What poets did you first come to
admire, and what was it about their work that intrigued you?
SC: If I say Hank Williams, will you laugh or cry? Or both?
Maybe it’s because we always had a lot of whippoorwills around our house but at
certain moments, I still want to sing
Hear that lonesome whippoorwill
He sounds too blue to fly
The midnight freight is whining low
I’m so lonesome I could cry
Williams’s songs are raw emotion
with a steel guitar, but sometimes that’s what you need.
Then there were
minimalists: Emily Dickinson, William
Carlos Williams, E. E. Cummings. I liked the way they used space. Like I said,
when I first saw “The Red Wheelbarrow” I was hooked.
And I was intrigued for a while
by the Middle English poets: Chaucer and the Gawain Poet (Pearl Poet) were
best. Chaucer could be so many people, some of them very earthy. The poetry I
read before college had been pretty heavily bowdlerized. Who knew you were allowed
to tell dirty jokes in poetry? But Chaucer is amazingly skilled at creating
characters who reveal themselves unawares by their speech. Gawain and the Green Knight was at once familiar and alien, like
Disney crossed with Stephen King. I loved horror stories when I was young.
Donne, Browning. Frost. James
Weldon Johnson’s God’s Trombones.
Young man—
Young man—
Your arm's too short to box with God.
Young man—
Your arm's too short to box with God.
Have your tastes in poetry changed over the years, and if so, in what
ways?
SC: My tastes in poetry have become more educated but I don’t
know that they’ve changed in essence. I’ve come to know more contemporary poets
and my taste ranges from Kay Ryan to Patricia Smith to Seamus Heaney who did an
excellent translation of Beowulf. I
still love the ancient poems – Gilgamesh, Beowulf, et al.
I seem to have a predilection
for Southern poets: Ellen Bryant Voigt and our own Maurice Manning. Natasha
Trethewey. Sally Rosen Kindred.
Looking at the poems I’ve named
in answering your questions, I’d say I am drawn to poems that are strongly
voiced and musical and that is completely predictable, because that is the kind
of poetry I attempt to write.
You just keep teaching me things
about myself, Karen.
What poets are you currently
reading, and can you recommend particular collections of theirs?
SC: I’m reading:
Cathryn Essinger’s A
Desk in the Elephant House.
Actually, I’m re-reading this book, her first, and I recommend it and
her other books: My Dog Does Not Read
Plato and What I Know about Innocence.
Joe Survant’s The
Land We Dreamed. This book is the last of a trilogy about Kentucky’s
history. The others are Anne and Alpheus
and Rafting Rise, the latter my
favorite.
Richard Jarrette’s Beso the Donkey, a book of short poems recommended to me by Cathy Essinger. It reads sort of like “Seventy Ways of Looking at a Donkey.” If Beso were a mule he’d fit snugly into a William Faulkner novel.
Lisa Williams’s A
Gazelle in the House. Lisa is a multi-award winning poet. I have just
started this book so I can’t say much about it. My favorite at this point is Woman Reading to the Sea, which won the
Barnard Women Poets Prize.
Do you have any writing projects
you're working on now?
SC: In a word, no. I’m enjoying the freedom to follow my nose
in the writing and to hope, like Mr. Macawber, that something will turn up.
To
read some of Sherry Chandler's poems and learn more about her and her work,
visit her website: http://sherrychandler.com/index.html.
Read her micro poetry on
Twitter @BluegrassPoet: https://twitter.com/BluegrassPoet
Karen George, MFA,
retired from computer programming to write full-time. She enjoys traveling
to historic river towns, mountains, and Europe. She is author of Into
the Heartland (Finishing Line Press, 2011), Inner Passage (Red Bird Chapbooks,
2014), Swim Your Way Back
(Dos Madres Press, 2014), and
forthcoming The Seed
of Me (Finishing Line Press, 2015).
You can find her work in Louisville Review,
Tupelo
Press 30/30 Project, Wind, Permafrost, Blast Furnace, qarrtsiluni, Found Poetry Review, and Still.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank-you for sharing your thoughts with us!